Advance Ruling Case No. 20
1. The provisions of the Ordinance
This ruling applies in respect of section 18E of the Inland Revenue Ordinance. |
2. Background
(a) | The Applicants comprise eight companies of the same group. They all commenced business after 1 April 1974. |
(b) | The holding company of the Applicants is Company A, a company incorporated in Country X. |
(c) | Company A and the Applicants make up their accounts to 31 December. |
(d) | For administrative reasons, Company A decided to change its accounting date to 30 June. To give effect to the change, accounts for 18 months will be drawn up for the period 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2005. |
3. The arrangement
(a) | The Applicants will change the accounting date from 31 December to 30 June in the year of assessment 2004/2005. The first set of financial accounts drawn up after the change will be for the 18 months ended 30 June 2005. The 18-month account finalization will be completed by the end of 2005. |
(b) | The reason put forward by the Applicants for the change of accounting date is to conform to the accounting date of Company A. |
4. The ruling
(a) | The Commissioner will adopt the 6-month period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2004 as the basis period of the Applicants for the year of assessment 2004/2005. |
(b) | The Commissioner will adopt the 12-month period from 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005 as the basis period of the Applicants for the year of assessment 2005/2006. |
(c) | The assessable profits/adjusted losses of the Applicants for the year of assessment 2003/2004 will not be recomputed as a result of the change of their accounting date from 31 December to 30 June. |
(d) | The assessments for 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 will be based on the financial accounts for the 18-month period from 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2005. |
5. The period for which the ruling applies
This ruling applies to the Applicants for the years of assessment 2003/2004, 2004/2005 and 2005/2006. |
6. The material assumptions in respect of a future event or any other matter made by the Commissioner
There are no assumptions made by the Commissioner. |
7 . Date of ruling issued
21 April 2005. |